Attack on a Paris train
Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2015 9:51 am
So we have a breaking story of a Moroccan with an AK47, a pistol and knives being overpowered by some unarmed guys on a Paris bound train. A couple of them were American servicemen and another was a civilian who also joined in to stop the attack as it was about to happen. Fortunately they managed to stop him before he could open fire and promptly beat the crap out of him in the bargain, pity they didn’t hold his head out of the train window in a tunnel, but at the very least they seem to have averted yet another attack by another adherent of the “religion of peace”.
The latest report was saying that they did not know yet if it was a planned terrorist act or not? Err, how many Europeans do you know that travel on a train with an AK47? Meanwhile we as a country are being besieged by and I use the word loosely, ‘refugees’ seeking asylum in the UK, more like being infiltrated by ISIS operatives. The only country to display any sort of regard for its own citizens and culture has been Slovakia who announced it will only accept Christian migrants “as Muslims would not like it here”. Now that may sound discriminatory, but is it? We all are very much aware that once these immigrant groups are allowed to settle anywhere that they start demanding special treatment and concessions from their host countries and that being the case then the statement is true. So common sense would say to only accept people who would fit in and be comfortable in your country and culture and being a Christian country that would mean Christians.
So that begs the question of why, with its huge financial reserves, plenty of land to build on and being the centre of the Islamic religion, does not Saudi Arabia and other rich Arab countries welcome with open arms their fellow Muslims? Why does not the huge Turkish and Egyptian armies sort out the problem of ISIS in Syria and elsewhere as they are the dominant force in the region? So many questions and too few answers, so once again Europe is expected to deal with these floods of economic migrants as if it were our responsibility, while the Arab countries stand by and watch.
The latest report was saying that they did not know yet if it was a planned terrorist act or not? Err, how many Europeans do you know that travel on a train with an AK47? Meanwhile we as a country are being besieged by and I use the word loosely, ‘refugees’ seeking asylum in the UK, more like being infiltrated by ISIS operatives. The only country to display any sort of regard for its own citizens and culture has been Slovakia who announced it will only accept Christian migrants “as Muslims would not like it here”. Now that may sound discriminatory, but is it? We all are very much aware that once these immigrant groups are allowed to settle anywhere that they start demanding special treatment and concessions from their host countries and that being the case then the statement is true. So common sense would say to only accept people who would fit in and be comfortable in your country and culture and being a Christian country that would mean Christians.
So that begs the question of why, with its huge financial reserves, plenty of land to build on and being the centre of the Islamic religion, does not Saudi Arabia and other rich Arab countries welcome with open arms their fellow Muslims? Why does not the huge Turkish and Egyptian armies sort out the problem of ISIS in Syria and elsewhere as they are the dominant force in the region? So many questions and too few answers, so once again Europe is expected to deal with these floods of economic migrants as if it were our responsibility, while the Arab countries stand by and watch.